NHS HDL(2000)14 |
|
|
Summary 1. This letter covers the report of the Scottish Health Service Ombudsman's investigations completed during 1999-2000. The report should be distributed widely and used by all Health Boards and NHS Trusts to review performance and take remedial action as required. Action 2. This is the first year that the Health Service Commissioner (Ombudsman) has published separate reports for England, Scotland and Wales. Enclosed is the Scottish Health Service Ombudsman Annual Report which includes summaries of the 12 completed investigation reports. 3. Board General Managers and Trust Chief Executives are asked to note the contents and:
|
Addressees For information Chief
Executive, Health Education ______________________________ Enquiries to: Mrs
Moira Milligen ______________________________ |
4. The attached Annex brings to your attention issues which the Ombudsman thought of particular importance. Yours sincerely
HECTOR
MACKENZIE
ISSUES ARISING
FROM THE SCOTTISH HEALTH SERVICE OMBUDSMAN'S 1. During 1999-00
the Health Service Ombudsman's office in Scotland received 215 complaints
2. Two matters which the Ombudsman wished to draw particular attention to arising from this year's investigations concerned treatment by general dental practitioners and communications between NHS staff. Three complaints were investigated concerning dissatisfaction with the adequacy of the treatment received from their dentists. Only one complaint was upheld. 3. The Ombudsman believes that problems with communication are central to many of the complaints put to his Office. Good communication is an essential part of good clinical treatment. He feels that effective communications often feature some or all of the following:
4. While the Ombudsman sees evidence of NHS bodies handling complaints well, several cases were dealt with in which a Health Board or Trust acted contrary to the complaints guidance or a complainer's request for an independent review panel was mishandled. For example, there were failures of staff to recognise the matter as a complaint, delays in taking action, and extended periods of time between an independent review panel request and the panel's actual meeting. 5. The Ombudsman is aware of the concern of many that conveners are often not seen as impartial and that this is an emerging theme from the work of the evaluation team studying the NHS complaints procedure. He believes that there are some practices that help secure the confidence of complainers and those complained about. These include seeing that conveners:
6. . The Ombudsman believes it is important that the public know of the recommendations he makes and of their implementation. The Ombudsman's staff make recommendations in order to reduce the risk that a shortcoming or failure will be repeated, whether or not an investigation takes place. In eight cases this year organisations agreed to take further action to resolve complaints without the need for an investigation, and in a further seven cases, advice was given without an investigation. 7. The current legislation under which the public sector Ombudsmen work is inflexible and can put unnecessary difficulties in the way of people who want to complain about more than one area of public service. This can lead to members of the public having to put a complaint to more than one Ombudsman about the same problem. 8. A review recently carried out in England recommended that a new Commission should be set up, combining the three main public sector Ombudsmen schemes in England - Parliamentary, Health Service and Local Government. A similar review is now taking place in Scotland and the Ombudsman awaits the outcome with interest. |